Carbo vs Plan A
 Carbo |  Plan A | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.2 / 5 | ⭐ 4.2 / 5 |
| Category | Energy & environment | Energy & environment |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| From | From €90/month (base plan, 12-month minimum commitment) | Pricing on request (annual subscription, pricing by entity and scope) |
| Ease of use | Beginner | Intermediate |
| French interface | Yes | — |
| API | — | Yes |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Carbo
Best for French SMEs and micro-enterprises that need a first carbon inventory compliant with the ADEME method at controlled cost, with guidance delivered in French and a simple interface. Not ideal if you are a mid-size or large group with complex EU CSRD obligations and multi-entity reporting: the tool will quickly hit its limits.
Our verdict: Plan A
Best for European scale-ups and SMEs seeking a scientifically rigorous, rapidly deployable solution for CSRD compliance. Not ideal if your team works primarily in languages other than English or if you need detailed on-site industrial tracking.
Still torn between Carbo and Plan A?
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →