Consensus vs Semantic Scholar
 Consensus |  Semantic Scholar | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.4 / 5 | ⭐ 4.3 / 5 |
| Category | Research & monitoring | Academic research & science |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Free |
| From | ~$10/month | Completely free (API included) |
| Ease of use | Beginner | Beginner |
| French interface | — | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Consensus
Ideal for healthcare professionals, wellness coaches, and consultants wanting to ground arguments in science without library hours. More accessible than Elicit for occasional searches. Avoid for in-depth systematic reviews: prefer Elicit then.
Our verdict: Semantic Scholar
Best for developers wanting to integrate scientific data into their applications, and for all researchers seeking a free and reliable discovery engine. Not for you if you need automated systematic reviews or data extraction: Elicit or Scite would be better suited.
Still torn between Consensus and Semantic Scholar?
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →