Corti vs Nabla
 Corti |  Nabla | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.2 / 5 | ⭐ 4.7 / 5 |
| Category | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| From | $50 in free credits, then pay-as-you-go (API) | ~$120/month per practitioner (30 free consultations/month) |
| Ease of use | Advanced | Beginner |
| French interface | — | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Corti
Ideal for health software publishers, hospital IT leaders, or HealthTech startups wanting to embed medical AI without building from scratch. Avoid if you seek a ready-to-use scribe: Corti is a technology layer, not an application for end-user practitioners.
Our verdict: Nabla
Ideal for any French-speaking doctor seeking to reduce documentation time without changing habits: the tool fades into the background during consultation. To avoid if you work in a large hospital with an unsupported exotic EHR, or if IT budgets impose on-site deployment.
Still torn between Corti and Nabla?
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →