Federato vs Planck
 Federato |  Planck | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.2 / 5 | ⭐ 4.1 / 5 |
| Category | Insurance & banking | Insurance & banking |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| From | Pricing on request | Pricing on request |
| Ease of use | Advanced | Intermediate |
| French interface | — | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Federato
The benchmark tool for MGAs, specialty insurers, and companies wanting real-time portfolio control while accelerating underwriting. Client results are impressive and verifiable. Reserve for organizations with a structured underwriting team and submission volume justifying investment: too powerful and expensive for a general broker or small mutual.
Our verdict: Planck
Highly effective for business P&C insurers seeking to automatically enrich underwriting files without multiplying manual data sources. Concrete time savings for underwriters. Less relevant for personal insurance, life, or personal lines: the engine is calibrated for business data, not individual profiles.
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →