Greenly vs Watershed
 Greenly |  Watershed | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.4 / 5 | ⭐ 4.5 / 5 |
| Category | Energy & environment | Energy & environment |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| From | Pricing on request (3 plans: GHG Report, Climate Action Ready, Net Zero Contributor) | Pricing on request (contracts starting at ~$50,000/year, enterprise market) |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| French interface | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Greenly
Best for mid-market and large French-speaking businesses already subject to or anticipating CSRD requirements, wanting a unified solution with expert support. Not ideal if your carbon footprint is simple (SMEs under 50 employees with no regulatory obligation): value-for-money will be poor against lighter solutions.
Our verdict: Watershed
Best for large international companies (revenue >€100M) needing to produce verifiable reports for strict investor or regulator requirements. Not ideal for any organization under 500 employees: complexity and cost are disproportionate.
Still torn between Greenly and Watershed?
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →