Mosaic vs Pigment
 Mosaic |  Pigment | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.2 / 5 | ⭐ 4.6 / 5 |
| Category | Finance & reporting | Finance & reporting |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| From | Starting from ~$10,000/year; pricing on request per scope | Pricing on request (mid-market: ~€300K-€600K/year for 100-200 users) |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| French interface | — | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Mosaic
Mosaic is relevant for CFOs at scale-ups and mid-market (50-500 employees) wanting to align finance and HR in one tool. The HiBob integration is a strong asset for existing HiBob customers. Avoid if you need complex multi-entity consolidation or your ERP isn't in the 30-connector list; Pigment or Vena are better bets.
Our verdict: Pigment
Pigment is the top choice for any CFO at mid-market to large enterprises (€100M+ revenue) wanting to replace Excel and Anaplan with a modern, French, AI-native solution. Too expensive and complex for a small business or SME under 50 employees; Causal or Cube is better suited.
Still torn between Mosaic and Pigment?
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →