Cursor vs Sourcegraph Cody
 Cursor |  Sourcegraph Cody | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.7 / 5 | ⭐ 3.9 / 5 |
| Category | Development & no-code | Development & no-code |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| From | ~$20/month | Pricing on request (Enterprise, ~$59/user/month) |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Advanced |
| French interface | Yes | — |
| API | — | Yes |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Cursor
For serious developers, it's a step above a simple autocomplete. The current reference for AI-assisted coding.
Our verdict: Sourcegraph Cody
Recommended for large enterprises with complex, multi-repo codebases where cross-repo search and multi-LLM compliance are priorities. Avoid for SMEs or solo developers: enterprise pricing and the removal of individual plans since 2025 make this inaccessible outside large accounts.
Still torn between Cursor and Sourcegraph Cody?
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →