Dify vs Latenode
 Dify |  Latenode | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.3 / 5 | ⭐ 4.1 / 5 |
| Category | Development & no-code | Automation |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| From | Free Sandbox (200 message credits, 1 member, 5 applications); Professional 590 USD/year per workspace; Team 1,590 USD/year; free Community edition self-hosted; Enterprise on request. Per-message-credit billing | Free (10,000 processor seconds/month, 5 scenarios); usage-based plan without subscription, billed per processor second (0.00012 USD per second at first tier, decreasing); add-on options 5 to 70 USD/month |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| French interface | — | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Dify
Best for technical SME teams who want to industrialize internal AI applications and keep data control via self-hosting. Avoid if you have no technical resources: install, model choice and RAG tuning demand skills that the visual interface does not replace.
Our verdict: Latenode
Best for SME technical teams who want code flexibility and AI agents in a visual tool, with a French website and solid free tier to start. Avoid if you need a fixed budget known in advance or server installation: processor-second billing is hard to forecast and Latenode has no self-hosted option like n8n.
Still torn between Dify and Latenode?
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →