Grain vs Jiminny
 Grain |  Jiminny | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.4 / 5 | ⭐ 4.1 / 5 |
| Category | Transcription & meetings | CRM & sales |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| From | Free (meetings capped at 45 minutes, 30-day history); Starter $15/seat/month annual ($19 monthly); Business $29/seat/month annual ($39 monthly); Enterprise on quote | Pricing on request (per-user billing, 14-day free trial announced without credit card) |
| Ease of use | Beginner | Beginner |
| French interface | — | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Grain
Best for small teams wanting auto-generated meeting summaries and shareable video clips at a clear price, with a free plan sufficient for short internal meetings. Not for you looking for a French tool or betting your budget on the free plan for customer calls: the 45-minute cap and lack of CRM connectors below Business quickly block commercial use.
Our verdict: Jiminny
Best for English-speaking sales teams wanting to structure coaching with evaluation frameworks and call scoring integrated to CRM, with a 14-day trial to test. Not for you if your team sells in French or strict European data residency is a blocker: the interface is not localized and the editor documents data processing outside the EU.
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →