Normative vs Sweep
 Normative |  Sweep | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.2 / 5 | ⭐ 3.8 / 5 |
| Category | Energy & environment | Development & no-code |
| Pricing model | Paid | Freemium |
| From | Pricing on request (Essential and Premium plans; ~€3,000-€5,000/year per third-party sources for SMEs) | Free (open source) / ~$120/month (paid plans) |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| French interface | — | — |
| API | Yes | — |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Normative
Best for mid-size international businesses needing rigorous emission factor databases and human expert support, especially for scope 3 and SBTi obligations. Not ideal if you are a French-speaking SME seeking interface in French or transparent, modular pricing.
Our verdict: Sweep
Best for development teams with a backlog of small tickets who want to automate them gradually without changing tools: Sweep integrates directly into existing GitHub workflow. Not ideal if you need complex tasks requiring deep functional understanding, or if you work on GitLab or Bitbucket; the ecosystem is limited to GitHub.
Still torn between Normative and Sweep?
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →