Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabnine
 Sourcegraph Cody |  Tabnine | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 3.9 / 5 | ⭐ 4.0 / 5 |
| Category | Development & no-code | Development & no-code |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| From | Pricing on request (Enterprise, ~$59/user/month) | $39/user/month |
| Ease of use | Advanced | Intermediate |
| French interface | — | — |
| API | Yes | — |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Sourcegraph Cody
Recommended for large enterprises with complex, multi-repo codebases where cross-repo search and multi-LLM compliance are priorities. Avoid for SMEs or solo developers: enterprise pricing and the removal of individual plans since 2025 make this inaccessible outside large accounts.
Our verdict: Tabnine
Recommended for regulated enterprises or teams who cannot send code to external servers: Tabnine is the only major player offering robust on-premise deployment with agents. Avoid for solo developers or startups with tight budgets; GitHub Copilot or Codeium offer better value at this stage.
Still torn between Sourcegraph Cody and Tabnine?
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →