Amplemarket vs Clay
 Amplemarket |  Clay | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.0 / 5 | ⭐ 4.6 / 5 |
| Category | CRM & sales | CRM & sales |
| Pricing model | Paid | Freemium |
| From | Startup $600/month on annual commitment (2 users, 27,000 contacts); Growth and Elite on quote | Free (6,000 actions/year, unlimited seats); Launch from $54/month annual or $167/month monthly; Growth from $185/month annual or $446/month monthly; Enterprise on quote |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Advanced |
| French interface | — | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Amplemarket
Best for English-speaking sales teams wanting to consolidate database, signals and sequences into a single subscription rather than stacking three separate licenses. Not for you if your prospecting budget is under several hundred euros per month: the $600/month entry plan with annual commitment and just two users is out of reach for a small business.
Our verdict: Clay
Best for SMEs and agencies building prospect files in-house and wanting data coverage well beyond a single vendor, with a free plan sufficient for testing. Not for you if no one on the team is comfortable with spreadsheets, formulas and English: Clay is configured, not consumed off-the-shelf, and credits burn fast.
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →