DISCO vs Relativity
D DISCO | R Relativity | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.2 / 5 | ⭐ 4.3 / 5 |
| Category | Legal | Legal |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| From | Pricing on request (billing based on volume of data processed, in GB) | Pricing on request (pay-as-you-go or 1- to 3-year commitment, no public amounts) |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Advanced |
| French interface | — | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: DISCO
Best for law firms and corporate legal departments managing high-volume litigation who want to accelerate review with AI. Not for you if you're an SME without recurring litigation: billing by data volume and the absence of public pricing make the tool poorly suited to occasional, one-off disputes.
Our verdict: Relativity
Best for law firms and corporate legal departments managing investigations or high-volume litigation who want a market standard with Microsoft 365 integration. Not for you if you need occasional use or are a small structure without in-house e-discovery expertise: the learning curve and request-based pricing don't justify an ad-hoc need.
Still torn between DISCO and Relativity?
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →