Greenhouse vs Textio
 Greenhouse |  Textio | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.5 / 5 | ⭐ 4.1 / 5 |
| Category | HR & recruitment | HR & recruitment |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| From | Pricing on request (from ~5 100 $/year) | Pricing on request (from ~10 000 $/year) |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Beginner |
| French interface | — | — |
| API | Yes | — |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Greenhouse
Greenhouse is the choice for operational recruiting excellence: if you want repeatable processes, minimal bias, and reliable funnel data, it's the reference. However, it's a complex, costly solution, entirely in English, and designed for HR teams of 3+ people. For a French-speaking SME under 100 employees, the cost/benefit ratio is unfavorable.
Our verdict: Textio
Textio is relevant for HR teams that publish job openings regularly and want to improve their employer brand and diversity. Major drawback for non-English speaking organizations: the platform is entirely in English and not adapted to non-English-speaking markets. High budget for small teams. Best reserved for mid-market companies with dedicated HR and English-language recruiting.
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →