Ashby vs Gem
 Ashby |  Gem | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.5 / 5 | ⭐ 4.3 / 5 |
| Category | HR & recruitment | HR & recruitment |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| From | Foundations $400/month for up to 100 employees (10% discount on annual commitment); Plus and Enterprise on quote; SSO at $100/month optional | Startup program (1 to 10 employees) $130/month billed annually instead of $270; six months free under 30 employees; beyond that, on quote based on headcount |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| French interface | — | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Ashby
Best for companies that hire continuously and want to replace an ATS, sourcing tool and reporting tool with a single platform, with usable pipeline data. Not for you if you hire sporadically or your HR team does not work in English: $400/month flat and an untranslated interface weigh heavily for a handful of roles a year.
Our verdict: Gem
Best for startups and scale-ups hiring technical or international profiles in volume who want to add AI sourcing without changing ATS, with very accessible pricing under ten employees. Not for you if you only hire locally in roles with thin online representation: automated sourcing value drops sharply.
Still torn between Ashby and Gem?
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →