Ashby vs SeekOut
 Ashby |  SeekOut | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.5 / 5 | ⭐ 4.1 / 5 |
| Category | HR & recruitment | HR & recruitment |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| From | Foundations $400/month for up to 100 employees (10% discount on annual commitment); Plus and Enterprise on quote; SSO at $100/month optional | Recruit Core self-service $149/month billed annually ($1,788/year) or $179/month without commitment; Sourcing, Integrations and Full Funnel on quote |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| French interface | — | — |
| API | Yes | — |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Ashby
Best for companies that hire continuously and want to replace an ATS, sourcing tool and reporting tool with a single platform, with usable pipeline data. Not for you if you hire sporadically or your HR team does not work in English: $400/month flat and an untranslated interface weigh heavily for a handful of roles a year.
Our verdict: SeekOut
Best for teams hunting rare technical talent internationally who also want to re-leverage your past applicant pool, with public pricing and no long contract. Not for you if you hire in France alone or for roles with thin online presence: the profile database is noticeably less dense and ROI is weak.
Still torn between Ashby and SeekOut?
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →