Shipsy vs Shipwell
 Shipsy |  Shipwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ⭐ 4.1 / 5 | ⭐ 4.2 / 5 |
| Category | Logistics & supply chain | Logistics & supply chain |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| From | Pricing on request (no pricing page accessible on the official site) | Pricing on request (the pricing page only offers a demo request) |
| Ease of use | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| French interface | — | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
Our verdict: Shipsy
Best for organizations managing their own transport and warehouse flows internationally and seeking a single platform rather than separate tools, with solid ERP connectors. Not for you if you are a French SME: no French interface, no public pricing, and a network of pre-integrated carriers geared to Asia and the Middle East rather than Europe.
Our verdict: Shipwell
Best for organizations operating freight flows in North America who want a modern TMS with an open API and native certified NetSuite integration. Not for you if your flows are European or if your team does not work in English: the carrier network, regulatory functions, and interface are calibrated to the US, and no pricing is shared before a quote.
We look at what you actually need and tell you which one to set up (or a third that fits better).
Ask us →